Enter Your Bet Details
How Staking Plans Work
A staking plan determines how much of your bankroll to risk on each bet. The right plan protects your capital during losing streaks and maximizes growth during winning periods. Here are the four most common strategies:
1. Flat Staking — The Simplest & Safest
You stake a fixed amount on every bet regardless of odds, confidence, or bankroll changes. Typically 1-3% of your starting bankroll.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Easy to follow | Doesn't adjust for edge size |
| Limited downside risk | Doesn't compound growth on winning streaks |
| Best for beginners | Same stake on 1.50 and 5.00 odds |
Formula: Stake = Flat % × Bankroll
Example: 2% of $1,000 = $20 per bet, every bet
2. Percentage Staking — Adapts With Your Bankroll
You stake a fixed percentage of your current bankroll, recalculated before each bet. As your bankroll grows, stakes grow; as it shrinks, stakes shrink.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Compounds winning streaks | Stakes can become very large after long winning runs |
| Automatically de-risks during losing streaks | Harder to predict absolute profit/loss |
| Never risks entire bankroll | Recovery from deep losing streaks is slow |
Formula: Stake = Percentage × Current Bankroll
Example: 2% of $1,200 (after growth) = $24 per bet
3. Kelly Criterion — Mathematically Optimal Growth
The Kelly Criterion calculates the mathematically optimal stake based on your edge (the difference between true probability and implied probability). It maximizes the long-term growth rate of your bankroll.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Mathematically optimal growth rate | Requires accurate probability estimation |
| Accounts for odds AND edge | Full Kelly leads to large swings |
| Zero stake when no edge exists | Overestimating edge = over-staking = risk of ruin |
Formula: Stake = (p × o - 1) / (o - 1) × Bankroll
where p = your estimated probability, o = decimal odds
Example: Edge = (0.55 × 2.10) - 1 = 0.155 → Kelly = 0.155 / 1.10 = 14.1% = $141
4. Labouchere System — Structured Chase
Write down a sequence of numbers. Stake the sum of the first and last numbers in your sequence. On a win, remove those numbers. On a loss, add the lost stake to the end. The goal is to eliminate all numbers.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Structured and methodical | Long losing streaks require very large stakes |
| Clear profit target (sum of sequence) | Not suitable for long-odds bets |
| Gambling psychology: clear "finish line" | Can exceed bankroll if sequence grows too long |
Base unit: Bankroll ÷ sum of sequence × base multiplier
Example: Sequence [1,2,3,4,5] = $15 target. Base unit = $1,000 / (1+2+3+4+5) × 3 ≈ $200 per unit
First bet = (1+5) × $200 = $1,200... adjust sequence to bankroll size
Strategy Comparison
| Feature | Flat | Percentage | Kelly | Labouchere |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complexity | ⭐ Easy | ⭐ Easy | ⭐⭐⭐ Hard | ⭐⭐ Medium |
| Risk Level | Low | Medium | High (full) / Medium (half) | High |
| Best For | Beginners | Intermediate | Sharp bettors with edge | Even-money bettors |
| Requires Edge Est. | No | No | Yes (critical) | No |
| Compounding | No | Yes | Yes | No (fixed target) |
| Risk of Ruin | Very Low | Low | High (full), Low (quarter) | Medium-High |
| Emotional Discipline | Easy | Easy | Hard (stakes vary widely) | Hard (chase temptation) |
5 Common Staking Mistakes
- Betting too much per stake: 5%+ per bet leads to rapid bankroll depletion. Most pros stay at 1-3%.
- Chasing losses with bigger stakes: Increasing stakes after losses is the #1 way to go broke. Stick to your plan.
- Overestimating your edge for Kelly: If your probability estimate is wrong, Kelly will over-stake aggressively. Use half or quarter Kelly.
- Not recalculating percentage stakes: Percentage staking only works if you recalculate before every bet. Stale bankroll figures lead to over-staking.
- Mixing staking strategies: Pick one plan and stick with it. Switching mid-stream means neither plan gets a fair test.
For a deeper guide on combining staking strategies with bankroll management, see our Bankroll Management Guide.